Comments for Cook's Collaborative Edge http://gordoncook.net/wp Helping Communities Build Bridges to 21st Century Communication Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:07:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 Comment on Why Facebook Belongs in The Enterprise by Informed Networker Blog » Facebook and Why It’s Not Ready for Businesses. http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=209#comment-49567 Informed Networker Blog » Facebook and Why It’s Not Ready for Businesses. Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:33:25 +0000 http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=209#comment-49567 [...]     Facebook is all the rage. Many would argue that it has become a hotter property than MySpace. It has become a must for new application developers looking for instant fame and glory and many are writing articles about the utilization of Facebook not only for personal communications but also for business use (see Ricardo Sueiras, JP Rangaswami, Gordon Cook). [...] […]     Facebook is all the rage. Many would argue that it has become a hotter property than MySpace. It has become a must for new application developers looking for instant fame and glory and many are writing articles about the utilization of Facebook not only for personal communications but also for business use (see Ricardo Sueiras, JP Rangaswami, Gordon Cook). […]

]]>
Comment on Why the Proposed Merger of NLR and Internet 2 Must Not Happen by Cook’s Collaborative Edge » Blog Archive » Enterprise or Public Sector Investment in NLR Presents a Unique Opportunity http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=211#comment-49510 Cook’s Collaborative Edge » Blog Archive » Enterprise or Public Sector Investment in NLR Presents a Unique Opportunity Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:40:33 +0000 http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=211#comment-49510 [...] The predominant membership of both NLR and I2 are an overlapping set of about 200 college and universities. For nearly three years now some of the members of both networks have bemoaned the “problem” that higher education is being asked to underwrite two sets of presumably duplicative high speed network infrastructure. On again off again merger discussions have led to some strange results that I have recently documented in my blog. [...] […] The predominant membership of both NLR and I2 are an overlapping set of about 200 college and universities. For nearly three years now some of the members of both networks have bemoaned the “problem” that higher education is being asked to underwrite two sets of presumably duplicative high speed network infrastructure. On again off again merger discussions have led to some strange results that I have recently documented in my blog. […]

]]>
Comment on Why the Proposed Merger of NLR and Internet 2 Must Not Happen by David Devereaux-Weber http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=211#comment-49483 David Devereaux-Weber Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:39:02 +0000 http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=211#comment-49483 I'm speaking for myself, this is not an official communication of my employer (The University of Wisconsin-Madison). I've done a lot of work with dark fiber and have some understanding of the value of df. My employer is a member of both I2 and NLR. I am strongly in favor of the merger. Both NLR and I2 value the df infrastructure of NLR, and I don't think a merged organization would squander that asset. I think that the window for df has come close to closing, compared to the 2000 era. In addition to the direct value of df it is also a great bargaining tool with telecom lit circuit vendors. One aspect of my work is uncompressed high definition television, which consumes 1.5 Gbps. Our group did a demonstration of 3 channels of uncompressed HD in 2005 with enpoints in Australia, Japan, the Netherlands, Seattle, San Diego, Ann Arbor and Madison. I appreciate the value of high bandwidth, and appreciate the meaning of geometric growth. (See http://www.dtc.umn.edu/mints/ to see the growth of Internet traffic.) In order for us (the higher education community or the global community) to continue to meet the need for increasing capacity, we will need to continue to embrace extraordinary methods and continually rebuild our networks. In order to support geometric growth in capacity while limiting increases in cost, we need to do research in technology and automation of processes to allow the same number of technical staff to support more users and bandwidth. The research work performed on both the I2 and NLR networks is crucial to that ongoing goal. We can not afford destructive competition between those networks. We need to work diligently to ensure the survival of both networks. <strong>(Gordon Cook - I agree.)</strong> I think this is best accomplished by the merger. <strong>(Gordon Cook - I disagree.)</strong> Dave I’m speaking for myself, this is not an official communication of my employer (The University of Wisconsin-Madison).

I’ve done a lot of work with dark fiber and have some understanding of the value of df. My employer is a member of both I2 and NLR. I am strongly in favor of the merger. Both NLR and I2 value the df infrastructure of NLR, and I don’t think a merged organization would squander that asset. I think that the window for df has come close to closing, compared to the 2000 era. In addition to the direct value of df it is also a great bargaining tool with telecom lit circuit vendors.

One aspect of my work is uncompressed high definition television, which consumes 1.5 Gbps. Our group did a demonstration of 3 channels of uncompressed HD in 2005 with enpoints in Australia, Japan, the Netherlands, Seattle, San Diego, Ann Arbor and Madison. I appreciate the value of high bandwidth, and appreciate the meaning of geometric growth. (See http://www.dtc.umn.edu/mints/ to see the growth of Internet traffic.)

In order for us (the higher education community or the global community) to continue to meet the need for increasing capacity, we will need to continue to embrace extraordinary methods and continually rebuild our networks. In order to support geometric growth in capacity while limiting increases in cost, we need to do research in technology and automation of processes to allow the same number of technical staff to support more users and bandwidth. The research work performed on both the I2 and NLR networks is crucial to that ongoing goal. We can not afford destructive competition between those networks. We need to work diligently to ensure the survival of both networks. (Gordon Cook - I agree.) I think this is best accomplished by the merger. (Gordon Cook - I disagree.)

Dave

]]>
Comment on Why the Proposed Merger of NLR and Internet 2 Must Not Happen by Gordon Cook http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=211#comment-48301 Gordon Cook Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:16:21 +0000 http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=211#comment-48301 Well, well - Mr Anonymous is an elder member of the higher education community and has not the COURAGE to sign his name. The IP number atttached 69.134.17.195 is - according to my friend at the Cernet research center in Beijing from where i am now connected - in the city of Charlotte NC. Hmmmm. Maybe Mike Roberts is visiting Charlotte? On a much more serious level I would say that anonymous is absolutely wrong. Internet 2 may be a goood network but quite to the coontary it is in a position to do very little for the national well being of the united states. What it is in a position to do is cause higher ed ever higher expenditures. READ THE REPORT. Did you READ the NTP report Mr Anonymous? If not you are shouting slogans. I believe the NLR Board will NOT approve the merger. (For many reasons.) NLR has unique and irrecplaceable infrastructure that MUST not be destroyed. Ask LEVEL 3 if they will sell an IRU for a pair of fibers covering their national foot print. They will not sell at any price. Ask your board why the prices that I2 memebers are payiing for their managed services are so much higher than NLR. If this merger goes through -NLR will be destroyed. Tell me where does the NTP report justify your cheer leading? Disprove my points! (If you can.) Read the parts i cited and tell me how this merger is so GOOD for higher education. I have been hearing for more than two years now that Mr Van Houwelling cannot abide the independent existence of NLR. Well no one is telling him he can't keep Internet 2...let hiim do so. Let him NOT destroy the best hope that the US has for a public infrastructure. I will say more about what i mean by that in about 30 days. I have been told by separate sources that the respective chairs of the respective boards prepared and sighed the memorandum restarting the network merger talks WITHOUT informing their boards until after they released the joint document. THAT is a very STRANGE way to play. I have published a detailed report on NLR 6 months ago so i know something aboout it. There are quite a few states that have committed public money to NLR. II would hope the board members are considering their fiduciary responssibility to those state members. Why? Because, if they approve the merger AS IT STANDS, NLR will be dead with 12 to 24 months. I hope they are consiidering whether they have adequate insurancee to protect them from the lawsuits that will follow. Dear MR Elder member of Hiigher Education Networks. Please respond with documented facts and not with slogans. They taught me at Duke where I got my PhD in 1972 to cite sources. In my first post I did. Here I include a bit more that is confidential. Your turn -- Facts not slogans please. Well, well - Mr Anonymous is an elder member of the higher education community and has not the COURAGE to sign his name. The IP number atttached 69.134.17.195 is - according to my friend at the Cernet research center in Beijing from where i am now connected - in the city of Charlotte NC. Hmmmm. Maybe Mike Roberts is visiting Charlotte?

On a much more serious level I would say that anonymous is absolutely wrong. Internet 2 may be a goood network but quite to the coontary it is in a position to do very little for the national well being of the united states. What it is in a position to do is cause higher ed ever higher expenditures. READ THE REPORT.

Did you READ the NTP report Mr Anonymous? If not you are shouting slogans. I believe the NLR Board will NOT approve the merger. (For many reasons.)

NLR has unique and irrecplaceable infrastructure that MUST not be destroyed. Ask LEVEL 3 if they will sell an IRU for a pair of fibers covering their national foot print. They will not sell at any price. Ask your board why the prices that I2 memebers are payiing for their managed services are so much higher than NLR.

If this merger goes through -NLR will be destroyed. Tell me where does the NTP report justify your cheer leading? Disprove my points!

(If you can.) Read the parts i cited and tell me how this merger is so GOOD for higher education. I have been hearing for more than two years now that Mr Van Houwelling cannot abide the independent existence of NLR. Well no one is telling him he can’t keep Internet 2…let hiim do so. Let him NOT destroy the best hope that the US has for a public infrastructure.

I will say more about what i mean by that in about 30 days.

I have been told by separate sources that the respective chairs of the respective boards prepared and sighed the memorandum restarting the network merger talks WITHOUT informing their boards until after they released the joint document. THAT is a very STRANGE way to play.

I have published a detailed report on NLR 6 months ago so i know something aboout it. There are quite a few states that have committed public money to NLR. II would hope the board members are considering their fiduciary responssibility to those state members. Why? Because, if they approve the merger AS IT STANDS, NLR will be dead with 12 to 24 months. I hope they are consiidering whether they have adequate insurancee to protect them from the lawsuits that will follow.

Dear MR Elder member of Hiigher Education Networks. Please respond with documented facts and not with slogans. They taught me at Duke where I got my PhD in 1972 to cite sources. In my first post I did. Here I include a bit more that is confidential.

Your turn –

Facts not slogans please.

]]>
Comment on Why the Proposed Merger of NLR and Internet 2 Must Not Happen by Anonymous http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=211#comment-48247 Anonymous Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:28:07 +0000 http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=211#comment-48247 With all due respect Mr Cook, there are only a handful of people who actually believe this merger should not happen. Those with this view have a highly parochial stance and are not thinking of our national and global interests. Most believe the merger MUST happen and should have happened about 18 months ago. While having both networks exist for some time is a necessary evil in order to bring together these two organizations - it is an evil that must be overcome and resolved quickly within the merged organization. We, the Higher Education and Research communities, are stronger as one than divided. As an elder member of the Higher Education community I have been disappointed with the lack of progress to date on this merger and I truly hope this merger survives all the political mine fields of the next few weeks. Our community will be so much stronger with the new organization than with the bifurcated and wasted resources we currently "enjoy". This is not just a dollars issue, it is a dollars and "sense" issue. To Internet2 and NLR - MERGE NOW! Finish your votes and waive your closing conditions and merge! merge! merge! With all due respect Mr Cook, there are only a handful of people who actually believe this merger should not happen. Those with this view have a highly parochial stance and are not thinking of our national and global interests. Most believe the merger MUST happen and should have happened about 18 months ago. While having both networks exist for some time is a necessary evil in order to bring together these two organizations - it is an evil that must be overcome and resolved quickly within the merged organization. We, the Higher Education and Research communities, are stronger as one than divided.

As an elder member of the Higher Education community I have been disappointed with the lack of progress to date on this merger and I truly hope this merger survives all the political mine fields of the next few weeks. Our community will be so much stronger with the new organization than with the bifurcated and wasted resources we currently “enjoy”. This is not just a dollars issue, it is a dollars and “sense” issue.

To Internet2 and NLR - MERGE NOW! Finish your votes and waive your closing conditions and merge! merge! merge!

]]>
Comment on 700 Mhz: FCC failed to Repect Congressional Requirements - Frontline Wireless Silent by WISPA » The last Frontier: 700 Spectrum http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=207#comment-47697 WISPA » The last Frontier: 700 Spectrum Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:09:16 +0000 http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=207#comment-47697 [...] Former FCC Chair Reed Hundt is looking for space in the spectrum auction to build a nationwide wholesale wireless network. Hundt is part of Frontier Wireless, one of the would-be bidders (or winners). According to Susan Crawford and Gordon Cook: [...] […] Former FCC Chair Reed Hundt is looking for space in the spectrum auction to build a nationwide wholesale wireless network. Hundt is part of Frontier Wireless, one of the would-be bidders (or winners). According to Susan Crawford and Gordon Cook: […]

]]>
Comment on Anger in New England Against Verizon and Fairpoint by C Becker sr http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=194#comment-47604 C Becker sr Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:27:06 +0000 http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=194#comment-47604 I will speak to what should happen after PUC's reject this deal. Fairpoint has gone on record (press releases) as saying that they can expand dsl by spending 13 milllion dollars in NH. If Fairpoint can do it for short money, why can't Verizon? Moreover, let's say Verizon says to the three northern states that we, collectively, can go pound sand. Then the leadership in the three northern states should make it their lives work to see that Verizon and any/all of their subsidiaries NEVER...repeat NEVER...see a wireless license in any of these states again. Shut off their revenue flow until they see fit to spend the money here. Unless Fios becomes part of the equation it is really a slow death spiral for the landline business due to the fact that DSL CANNOT compete with catv's triple play. Verizon knows this, yet they try to convince the PUC's in three states that Fairpoint can do it!! I find this to be very revealing. Verizon made the move, as a corporate business plan, to compete with CATV thru Fios. And it's working, in the locations that have it. But the position that Fairpoint can completely up-date the neglected plant, build all new back-office systems, expand DSL, offer IPTV, honor labor contracts, establish new vendors, pay out dividends that would choke Ray Burton (hard to do), pay off their incredible debt commitments, hire 675 new employees, while at the same time reducing the existing Verizon costs by almost 40 % (you remember...the press release that calls for $75 million in saving synergies). This position is simply too ridiculous to take seriously. Remember that Verizon says they couldn't Make money here, and they weren't spending any!!! Fairpoint will be able to make money using basically the same technology that Verizon is all but abandoning?? SMOKE AND MIRRORS!!! I will speak to what should happen after PUC’s reject this deal. Fairpoint has gone on record (press releases) as saying that they can expand dsl by spending 13 milllion dollars in NH. If Fairpoint can do it for short money, why can’t Verizon? Moreover, let’s say Verizon says to the three northern states that we, collectively, can go pound sand. Then the leadership in the three northern states should make it their lives work to see that Verizon and any/all of their subsidiaries NEVER…repeat NEVER…see a wireless license in any of these states again. Shut off their revenue flow until they see fit to spend the money here. Unless Fios becomes part of the equation it is really a slow death spiral for the landline business due to the fact that DSL CANNOT compete with catv’s triple play. Verizon knows this, yet they try to convince the PUC’s in three states that Fairpoint can do it!! I find this to be very revealing. Verizon made the move, as a corporate business plan, to compete with CATV thru Fios. And it’s working, in the locations that have it. But the position that Fairpoint can completely up-date the neglected plant, build all new back-office systems, expand DSL, offer IPTV, honor labor contracts, establish new vendors, pay out dividends that would choke Ray Burton (hard to do), pay off their incredible debt commitments, hire 675 new employees, while at the same time reducing the existing Verizon costs by almost 40 % (you remember…the press release that calls for $75 million in saving synergies). This position is simply too ridiculous to take seriously. Remember that Verizon says they couldn’t Make money here, and they weren’t spending any!!! Fairpoint will be able to make money using basically the same technology that Verizon is all but abandoning?? SMOKE AND MIRRORS!!!

]]>
Comment on Anger in New England Against Verizon and Fairpoint by Elaine Mockler http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=194#comment-46023 Elaine Mockler Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:49:47 +0000 http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=194#comment-46023 I am a disatisfied Fairpoint New England customer, only by default. They are the only company who provides service to our road, (not really rural). The service is terrible (telephone and DSL), the customer service, yet worse. I only know people who have Fairpoint but default, not choice. Any suggestions anyone? I am a disatisfied Fairpoint New England customer, only by default. They are the only company who provides service to our road, (not really rural). The service is terrible (telephone and DSL), the customer service, yet worse. I only know people who have Fairpoint but default, not choice. Any suggestions anyone?

]]>
Comment on What’s Wrong with this Picture? Fairpoint, USF, and Vermont by Stephen Otter Holmes http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=193#comment-44007 Stephen Otter Holmes Mon, 09 Jul 2007 04:58:38 +0000 http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=193#comment-44007 I am glad to see that there are folks out there, or should I say on here, who truly understand the implications of the Verizon to Fairpoint sale. Thank you for posting my reference to the Randy Barber testimony. I have been participating with others on a grassroots website titled verizonvsfairpoint.com . I encourage all folks with an interest in this matter to visit that site, as there are some very interesting posts (not just my own - heh). Kudos on your website by the way! An added note regarding USF abuse. Fairpoint not only lines their dividend pockets with USF, word has it that they are lobbying to get the rules changed to increase their cut of the USF pie. They must start every day with a movie clip of Michael Douglas saying "greed is good". As a matter of proper disclosure etticate, I will state that I am an ex-employee of Fairpoint, and a recovering accountant. I am glad to see that there are folks out there, or should I say on here, who truly understand the implications of the Verizon to Fairpoint sale. Thank you for posting my reference to the Randy Barber testimony. I have been participating with others on a grassroots website titled verizonvsfairpoint.com . I encourage all folks with an interest in this matter to visit that site, as there are some very interesting posts (not just my own - heh). Kudos on your website by the way! An added note regarding USF abuse. Fairpoint not only lines their dividend pockets with USF, word has it that they are lobbying to get the rules changed to increase their cut of the USF pie. They must start every day with a movie clip of Michael Douglas saying “greed is good”.
As a matter of proper disclosure etticate, I will state that I am an ex-employee of Fairpoint, and a recovering accountant.

]]>
Comment on What’s Wrong with this Picture? Fairpoint, USF, and Vermont by Karl Bode http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=193#comment-43581 Karl Bode Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:32:14 +0000 http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=193#comment-43581 Still digesting this, but is this $1.7 billion in addition to the $600 million in tax savings from the process? http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=21&ItemID=12866 Still digesting this, but is this $1.7 billion in addition to the $600 million in tax savings from the process?

http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=21&ItemID=12866

]]>